On a superb and frank interview of retired US General and possible Presidential candidate Wesley Clarke, conducted by the more superb Amy Goodman on Democracy Now, [HERE], Clarke tells us on around 20th September 2001, the US had already tken the decision to attack Iraq. In keeping with traditional forn, all the talk of diplomacy from Killers Bush and Blair using diplomacy going through the UN etc etc was utter BS.
A few weeks after 20th Sept, Gen. Wesley Clarke learned from a Pentagon General that the US had a plan to take out 7 countries in 5 years.
Iraq HIT
Syria
Lebanon HIT
Libya
Somalia BEING HIT
Sudan
Iran
What he says he was told certainly seems to be the case. Syria was accused of the MASSIVE bomb which killed Rafiq Hariri. It seems like the usual suspects (UK, US or occupiers of Palestine) dropped a (laser guided) bomb on Hariri's motorcade. Then we had the US supported groups in Lebanon demanding Syria withdraw. What you weren’t told (deliberately of course) is that there were far bigger demonstrations in support of Syria. We also have stories of Syria being used to supply the Iraqi resistance and of helping get weapons to Hizbolla. All this demonization is of course to legitimize an attack on Syria. So I'd say the timetable is cocked up (because Rumsfeld 'cake walk' didn't materialise in the Iraqi swamp)
Libya strangely came in from the west would have us as being the cold. The BBC telling us Muammar al-Gaddafi gave up his WMD program (he's probably not white enough to be allowed to play with WMD) and admitting to the Lockerbie bombing. Of course, the fact the CIA planted the circuitry fragments supposedly from the bomb which was the prime evidence (with the German link) "connecting" the Libyans with bombing doesn't matter in addition to the fact that there were indications that the Luggage for that flight appeared tampered with by parties unknown (hummm.. what country is known to be involved with airport security forms I wonder). Well Libya’s foreign minister said they paid the compensation and admitted it simply to move on and not because they were actually guilty. But that doesn't matter. Some gobbledegook speaking Arabs were made to pay for something so we can all be happy. Perhaps why an attack on Libya seems ridiculous now is because the Colonel was told that the MI6 plan to assassinate him had been dusted off the shelf again and this time they would try not just to kill his daughter instead. Whatever, Muammar al-Gaddafi has managed to stop the leviathan from attacking it.
Sudan - well, US celebs are busy demonising the Sudanese govt even though its apparent to anyone who takes an honest look at history that any killing that’s going on is almost certainly the work of US supported groups. Nicaragua and the Contras are perhaps one of the better examples although there are a few tens of other examples which follow closely behind. Al-Jazeera has reported Sudan’s potential and it explains well why the US and its best buddies are killing people there and want to kill more openly in the future.
Iran - What can be said about Iran that hasn't been said already? Well there's the hypothesis that Iran is in a secret alliance with the occupiers of Palestine to bring about what the Shiite Muslims call the twelfth imam who will also be accepted as Moshiach of the zionists. The 12 Imam conspiracy is something I'm looking into and must admit, there are questions that need serious attention. I would not have entertained this idea on initial hearing about it, but I found out that Haliburton is actually in partnership with the Iranian govt in the Iranian oil sector. Also having a leaning towards a illuminati/masonic connection between many world governments, I must not dismiss talk of such an Iranian occupiers of Palestine secret plan. The Shiite brutality against Sunnis in Iraq and the ridiculous Hizbollah attack on the occupiers of Palestine are suspicious I find which makes me suspicious of Shiite leaders. As normal of course the ordinary Shiite people are good people, but possibly manipulated/misguided. A leading supporter of the alliance theory, a man of high intellect who I respect very much tells me not to fear, Iran will not be attacked for this reason. But I cant see how the leaders involved in a conspiracy actually would care if their ordinary civilians were killed for some long term goal. After all, Tony Blair murdered in part 50+ people in London on 7-July-2006. And is directly responsible for the deaths of 100 British soldiers on what he knew to be a pack of Lies. I think the signs are that Iran will be hit.