Gordon. Not that I ever thought you'd never get there. Really, the only question was how quickly, but all the same... you didn't waste much time did you.

Welcome to the cabal of imperialist oppressors.

Let this be a lesson to those fools who believed Brown was EVER going to change things, having occupied the No. 2 job in UK politics for almost 10 years and voted for all the crap we have today. . The face changes, but the policy stays the same. The same old tired policy of killing to get what you want.

the world owes the US not debt, but DEATH!. The world ows a return of the death for the US has dispensed across the globe like confetti on a royals wedding day.

Nick Robinson (BBC political correspondent) said Mr Brown was "walking a tightrope" in his dealings with America. - Absolute rubbish. Its the BBC that’s straddling the tightrope. Being careful not to fall off on wither side. On the left is the truth, on the right is the pit of 'even obvious to a blind man' propaganda.

Both countries are impaled by the Zionist spike, (one on each fang) so of course they'll be allies.

How ridiculous.

And OI GORDON! Where's the 7-7 independent Inquiry???

How many more killings of Iraqi people and British soldiers are you gonna be responsible for??

We should acknowledge the debt the world owes to the United States for its leadership in this fight against international terrorism
Gordon Brown
link

Update:
Brown further persuit of the policies he supported and probably helped formulate over the last 10 years as exchequer reminds me of John Kerry (Judas Kohn) when Bush "defeated" him in the last US "(s)election". Kerry was for sending an extra 40,000 US killers to Iraq, but we had anti-war people in shock that Bush "won".

And now we see...
Democrat Barack Obama spells out his foreign policy: “I will not hesitate to use force”
- by Andre Damon - 2007-07-29

Americans will never vote for a man with Hussain in his name. And Clinton is likely to win. If USans has any sense, Rep. Ron Paul would win, but the chances of that are about the same as Bush going to heaven.

Bloody hell Gordon. Your shoes are on fire!!!
Britain’s Gordon Brown becomes patron of Zionist agency

This article is prompted by the 1992 (MCMXCII) documentary called "To the brink of eternity" by Adam Curtis as part of the Pandora's box documentary series. It was an excellent piece of work and provided encouragement to me in the way I look at the universe and the plight of man. To assist you through this commentary, I've provided a childish, yet relevant diagram. to aid visualisation of my view.

This post touches on a number of issues.

1) The mathematical nature of the universe
2) Man separates rational thinking (evident, provable) from irrational (unexplainable) thinking.
3) Rational thinking is the domain of man, Irrational thinking is a further step on the path towards God.
7) Rationalization provides a fertile ground for atheism and agnosticism.
4) Bipolarization lies within the realm of rationality.
2) The nature of man is overwhelmingly bipolar.
3) The manipulation of mankind utilizes bipolarization.
Please do not misunderstand the sense in which I am using the word irrational.

I have a belief that the vast majority of ordinary people are strongly mentally manipulated, and the method by which this manipulation is achieved is bipolarization.. That so many are manipulated proves its effectiveness. It is easy to manipulate people this way because bipolarization is in tune with or species. It appeals to our sense of being. We are very much binary people.

Life - death
Microsoft - Apple
Boeing - Aerobus
Democracy - Communism
West - East
Intel - AMD
Labour - Conservative
Republican - Democrat
Liberal - conservative (small c!)
Loyalists - republicans
White roses - red roses
Positive liberty - negative liberty
"With us or with the terrorists"
crucially: IF - THEN

There may be a 'third way' in those choices, e.g. the Liberals alongside Labour and the Conservatives in the UK, but if a third choice is present, it is very often of little relevance. And please do not confuse the expression 'third way' with mass murderer Tony bLiar's so called "third way", which as it transpires, meant cloaking oneself in the colours of socialism yet pursuing a far right wing agenda.

I have come to believe that the closest we can get to 'seeing' the universe, and the creation of the universe is not just via mathematics, but mathematics itself! Math is the most fundamental subject - the central point of existence. Physics is the application of maths towards physical matter and systems. Chemistry is the consequence of physics in relation to atomic scale systems. Biology is the Chemistry of living systems. Art is chemistry, biology, sometimes physics, and perception. Perception being one of the irrational fields. Etc. Everything is mathematical and one could argue that, as everything can be simulated in a computer, therefore it demonstrates everything can be represented by 1's and 0's. I see it as no surprise that many philosophers were also scientists.

The documentary:
I have now seen many of Adam Curtis's documentaries. They are invariably political - Good!, and seek to explain why and how politics progressed along various lines following the second world war. They are excellent sources of information and highly relevant even to our lives today, particularly as westerners. Which brings me to a slight criticism, in that, they might have been even better pieces of journalism had they, where appropriate, incorporate a non-western viewpoint. But nothing's perfect.

Moving on, The documentary proved reassuringly useful to my own view because it dealt with a highly bipolar phase in human history - that of the cold war and therefore acted as a case study and revealed things about how man operates in such conditions.

In "To the brink of eternity", Curtis reports that After WW2, the US political fraternity came to believe the science of rationality/logic/statistics/systems analysis (choose your favourite term), could give significant levels of previously unavailable control, destiny and of course, advantage, to shape the world. The RAND {Research and Development} corporation, a 'scientific' think tank in California, were instrumental advocates of this political philosophy and soon became hugely influential within a number of US administrations from Kennedy even up to today?s incumbent, global killer, George W Bush. For a time, particularly over the three decade span from the 60's up to the 80's, US foreign policy became highly encapsulated sealed into this way of thinking.

[01:09]
Sam Cohen, Inventor of the neutron bomb, RAND Corporation 1947-1975:
"They believed, I think honestly at the beginning and fraudulently at the end, that they could create a better world and have control over this process of recreating the world through their science and their mathematics, because it all sounded so damn rational and so damn reasonable, as to be unassailable". A sort of ironic statement from Mr. Cohen it must be said.

As the documentary progresses, we are given more insight into the minds of these rationalists. Such as the strategist, Herman Khan, who believed you could control (and win) a nuclear war:

[07:53]
Albert Wohlstetter, RAND Corporation 1951 - 1992(min), one of the main men at RAND (*CHECK* that) who proposed these rational systems, in context of the cold war strategies, said: "I drew the analogy with the western gun duel. The gunmen and the sheriff were not necessarily morally equivalent, in any sense, but they each might find themselves in a position where they had to draw first in order to survive. And this would be a rational act if they found themselves in that position. So I wanted to design the posture where it would never make sense for an adversary on his own terms to attack"

[14:34]
Curtis says Under the strategists new plans, Soviets military targets would be annihilated first. Americas remaining missiles would be held back to threaten Russians cities and force the soviet government into submission. The most notorious proponent of these plans was Herman Khan left RAND and set up his own institute near New York. He was convinced a controlled nuclear war possible."

[15:02]
Herman Kahn, Consultant to Department of Defence, early 1960s: "Just because you go to war, that in itself may be an irrational act, or may not, but even you irrationally decide to go to war it doesn't mean you have to fight it in a wildly irrational fashion." The interviewer asks: "Many people feel that even if they survive a nuclear war, that things are going to be so awful and life is going to be so destroyed everywhere that they'd actually rather be dead." Kahn replies: "That's a almost completely standard reaction its really a reaction to try and prevent thinking about the subject. And I'll make a comment which gets me into a great deal of criticism let me make it anyway. Objective studies indicate that the post war environment, while hostile to human life, more hostile than the pre-war environment will not be so hostile as to quote "preclude normal and happy lives"

His daughter, Debbie Kahn gives a scenario of the strategists:
[16:00] said: "[say] There's an accident. We [the US] drop a bomb on Kiev. It was a fluke. We didn't mean to. The Russians believe we didn't mean to. Then There's a negotiation about where can we drop a bomb on something that?s of equal value of Kiev. IF we {the Soviets, in response} drop a bomb we can stop now. If we destroy something equal, we can sort it out."

[17:50]
Sam Cohen again: "These analysts were human beings. They were no ordinary human beings. They had more than a smattering of megalomaniacs, Herman Khan being one of them, Albert Wohlstetter, another megalomaniac. There was this feeling that they could gain control and a huge degree of power by doing these studies. and so these animists did indeed achieve their grandeous dream They were in full control." {i.e. advising the US administration and this administration lapping up}. More irony, None the less the point is there."

The Cuban missile crisis and the fact the planet had been brought to the edge of oblivion, showed serious flaws of the "rational" method they had employed to try forge America's way through the latter part of the 20th Century. In fact, or so it seems, it was an irrational act by Kennedy that averted likely global destruction.

[21:33]
Curtis: "In the End, president Kennedy ignored any idea of controlled {Ed: rational} war. Instead, he told the Russians that if they launched just one missile from Cuba, he would retaliate with Americas entire arsenal. To the strategists, this threat was irrational and humiliating."

[21:50]
William Kaufmann. RAND Corporation, Consultant to Secretary of Defence 1961-1980:
"My only Recollection is that one of disappointment. I mean President Kennedy indicated that the US had the capability to engage in massive retaliation. Which lead several of us to wonder why he had used this particular language and why he hadn't gone to what at least we though of as the more powerful and rational approach to deterrence. It seemed to me that it would be utter folly for us to go in what my colleague Herman Khan called a ?wargasm? and try and destroy everything we could because that in effect would sign the death warrant of the united states."

So we see the 'systems analysis' approach was applied to the cold war was a dangerous failure.

But actually the philosophy of the RANDites or RANDies if you prefer, WAS essentially actually correct!. Note: I am NOT saying the policies based on systems analysis were correct, or ethical - clearly they were not, but the idea that prediction and control could be achieved was correct because it was based on math, the playing field of the universe. Where they went wrong, was that their models were not good enough. This is understandable given the complexity of life, and humans.

Similarly, Lyndon Johnson and Robert McNamara?s blinkered application of rationalism was the foundation in their decision to bomb Vietnam.

Curtis narrates that the Vietnam war corrupted the scientific method for the sake of the politicians power. The corruption being that the military didn't follow the correct procedure according to the model. An example was given when a scared, old, Vietnamese woman, was shot in the back simply for fleeing a US platoon. Her manslaughter was ultimately recorded as being a VC member. The data feeding the model was corrupt. But still, this attribution to the failure of systems analysis because of this is erroneous, as the model was fundamentally flawed to begin with. The corruption I would say, merely accelerated the exposure of the model failure.

And Curtis makes another big contradiction, because he shows it was Kennedy's irrationality [21:33] that saved the day yet, later, [44:48] he says: "The strategists were part of an age that believed political problems the could be solved by the application of knowledge. Their success in preventing Armageddon, seemed proof that it worked. But they were lucky enough to inhabit a world that was simple. frozen by the deadlock between the superpowers. That odd moment in history is over and with it has gone the optimistic faith that the world was being changed for the better" But it was the use of irrationality that saved the day. The strategists had failed, and as we have seen - twice!

Here's some more on the minds of these analysts:

[26:15]
Futurist Herman Khan: "I would guess in a hundred and certainly in less than 200 years, if all go at all well, 90 or 95% of the worlds people will be living than current american standards of living. Your men will grow up in everywhere poor, everywhere the danger of hunger, starvation, through a life in which the technology largely insulates you from nature" {Ed: i.e. he's saying technology will remove the problems of starvation etc}

[25:25]
1967 Dr Olaf Helmer (*check name*) of the RAND corporation: "We wind up with world which has the following features: fertility control, 100 year lifespan, controlled thermonuclear power, continued automation, genetic control, man-machine symbiosis, household robots, wide band communications, opinion control and continued urbanisation."

Now this is spooky. These words are 40 years old and yet they mention wide band comms, genetic control, man-machine symbiosis, and most chillingly of all perhaps is "opinion control"!! - Must check up on Dr Olaf Helmer (*check name*)

Later in the programme, The Regan "Star Wars" years are mentioned, which essentially was a recycling of recent history of Khan's controllable and therefore winnable nuclear conflict. Lying sleazebag Donald Rumsfeld was also influential in the Regan administration and did a SECOND repeat of 'Khan history' with GW Bush missile defence shield and controllable conflict - Iraq. In Regan?s administration, a senior player in Star Wars strategy was Edward Teller. I'd guess Rumsfeld and he were associates.

[40:18]
Dr Hugh DeWill, Physicist, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. : "There were a small number of x-ray laser tests done underground in Nevada, but these tests were failures as weapons and that in no way could thing be made into a weapon force and used in space. In that sense they were failures, yet in spite of this, Edward Teller wrote glowing letters to high government officials under president Regan

[40:38]
Edward Teller: "This X-ray laser is a remarkable invention." Congressional testimony??
Teller wrote: "For instance, a single X-ray laser module the size of an executive desk, which applied this technology, could potentially shoot down the entire Soviet land based missile force, if it were to be launched from the (module steel lebeu??).

The war criminal, Robert McNamara, resigned in 1967, not because he was instrumental in the killing of countless Asians, but because he didn't meet the desired objective. Sick - I know.

In Montréal, McNamara said in a speech

Who is man?
Is he a rational animal?
If he is, then the goals can be achieved.
If he isn't,
then there is little point in making the effort.

Can you spot the problem with what McNamara says? Sure it looks sound when you read it, but the point is, he's STILL applying rationality. Of course he is - rationality is the domain of men. Not only that, he offers only two answers as the only possibilities, demonstrating bipolarization! We are locked into this way of thinking. McNamara should had addressed a third point in which rationality and rationality were both present. Irrationality needs to be factored into the model somewhere then the model will become strong enough to yield those results and control they are after. But irrationality is by nature, difficult (if not impossible) to penetrate. Even then however, if the desired control and order is achieved, the irrationality of people may result in strong rejection of an increasingly ordered world, and rightly so I'd argue. We are rational beings, but contain irrationality so the absence of absence of rationality or irrationality is against the human spirit, and when the balance between them is disturbed by a political lurch towards one side occurs, then that's when the problems start. I believe this idea is not new and is mentioned in oriental philosophy of Ying and Yang.

One reason why the lurch towards rationality may happen is because of lack of God consciousness. Belief in God/spirituality etc being irrationality side of us - an essential ingredient for balance.

[23:20]
George Ball, US Under-Secretary of State in Kennedy Administration 1961-1966: "I think the Americans have made a kind of theology about using scientific means to solve political problems. The belief that this is a kind of substitute for religion that you turn to these mysterious forces which we have begun to harness for the first time, and you can become the mater of everything and we don?t have to worry about other things"

When I heard George say these words, my thoughts on this matter came together and I was pleased with the result.

The non-believer has this world only to live in. His time is limited. He may feel that he must get the most out of it in the short time that he has. If so, he more likely to a very calculating person - employing rationality. To this person, the ends may well justify the means. Of course there will be exceptions - there has to be, because the irrational component in us is I believe in-extinguishable. The strong non-believer has the potential to become a believer. Non-believers may also want to leave the world a better place than they found it and may do acts of good, again because of irrationality. Rationality and irrationality are not evil and good respectively, but I'd say are amplifiers of good and evil. Those more willing to believe in things which may not be explainable, I believe will be closer to believing in God (of some description) and more likely, on the whole as being good people.

BBC World 6:00am broadcast 29-7-07

A not so newsworthy news item appeared on BBC world just now. Gordon Brown visit to the US. So? Well, the news readers voice intonation when introducing it, was totally wrong. The style of reading it was similar to that when a trivial, jovial, entertainment kind of "and finally..." type story appears. For example, "The Harry Potter books may have come to an end but Harry is set to make a comeback by taking part in a 20 minute play to the children at St. Thomas's hospital" - You know, that kind of "fun" news. It really stood out because it was so bizarre. Now the suspiciousness inside me thinks therefore that this wasn't a mistake but actually a small step to do their bit to try and make Brown and Bush more pleasing to the senses. I can tell you if I was reading the news about Bush I'd use one hell of a more appropriate tone when reading it. Brown too shows no signs of pulling out of Iraq. He was never likely too until it becomes apparent that the puppet government they have helped to put in place has displayed some stickiness - a reluctance to be moved out of office, so that the can deliver Iraqs oil to the US and the UK.

P.S. Did you know it is said that the UK's North Sea oil is now past peak production?

YOUR HELP NEEDED !

Yet again, the lying, cheating, self-serving and self-protecting sleaze balls in the UK government are not guilty. This time,

The {intelligence and security} committee said it had found no evidence that the UK was directly involved in rendition flights - the transportation of terror suspects to foreign prisons where they could face torture.
- link -

To help others see what a fantastic and exemplar government we have, please help me to compose a list of other serious and terrible crimes the UK government is not guilty of.
 
examples:
1) Extraordinary rendition: Not guilty
2) Deliberately lying about Iraq's WMD's: Not guilty
3) Selling peerages: Not guilty.
4) Lying about the incursion into Iranian waters: Not guilty
etc....
etc....
etc....

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6915633.stm

SHAME ON YOU SOUTH KOREAN GOVERNMENT.

This persons death lies at your doorstep.

You should have agreed to pull out your forces.

First, please see:
1) Craig Murrays blog -
http://www.craigmurray.co.uk/archives/2007/07/british_map_in.html#comments
2) Famous for 15 megapixels - http://stefzucconi.blogspot.com/2007/07/euphemisms-2.html

Allow me to blow away the fart cloud the FO just produced

FO fart cloud:
“We conclude that there is evidence to suggest that the map of the Shatt al-Arab waterway provided by the Government was less clear than it ought to have been,” the report said.

Now, the fresh clear air. Courteously of me:
"The Government headed by Tony Blair, lied about the waterway. It did so out of a default position of hostility towards the democratic republic of Iran, possibly with intent to use the event for propaganda later in the context of a looming war. This failure to check facts is construed as deliberate. Its failure to contact Mr. Larijani is a terrible demonstration of gross neglect of diplomacy and embodied this Blair Government and exhibits elements of imperialistic supremacy. The Government must apologise unreservedly to the Iranian government, and draw lessons from this farce. Areas of potential dispute with regard to Irans claimed boundaries should be totally avoided. Efforts to establish maritime boundaries by Iraq/Iran bilateral consensus should be encouraged. The British soldiers who lied should be disciplined appropriately and any one who advised them to sell their stories fired immediately." the report should have said.

There. Much better.

The Geneva conventions (http://www.hrweb.org/legal/undocs.html) established that captives must be treated humanely and without torture. No matter what their crime, or alleged crime, they were still to be regarded as humans and given certain basic standards of treatment. That such a convention is needed is a an appalling stain on the human race or rather some elements of it.

Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Powell, Wolfowitz, Khalilizad, Perle, Bolton, Armitage, Ashcroft, Feth, Rice, and the other criminal Neocon associates, continue to destroy the beautiful values that should be the United States of America; although, it is open to speculation that to whether Bush has the mental capacity to understand anything about a civil society above that contained within a 50's 'cowboy and Indian' propaganda movie. This bunch of killers have ignored these international laws on the detainment and treatment of people. We shouldn't forget the Democrats who have played their part in continuing this oppressive world, which we STILL don't have the virtue to put behind us.

Worthy of mention in this list of slippery scum, is John Yoo, a 'professor' of "Law" at Berkley (A University in California) who apparently defended the allowance of the US to crush the testicles of a in order to get their parents to divulge information in accordance with US law.[1,2,3,4].

Nice John Yoo, torture advocate.

While I'm at it perhaps I could mention the clearly illegal calls by some well known USans, for the assassination of Hugo Chavez and Iran’s Ahmadinejad but that may be stretching the scope of this article a bit. Oops, I did it. Never mind.

Faced with increasing disquiet and unease in the States, not to mention the growing threat of litigation against Bush's administration for all on their flagrant disregards for basic standards in civil behaviour, not just from truly patriotic, conscientious US citizens, but also from international organisations, Bush's team has attempted to spin the Geneva conventions to get away with torture and brutish treatment.

Actually the deviousness of this action is immense and no doubt they are proud of their achievement. Basically, by making legislation on torture and detention which the Geneva convention already covers, it provides an excuse for them to redefine what treatment is acceptable and what isn't. The Geneva conventions on this have been pushed into irrelevance. Perhaps the most crucial aspect of the US spin is to make CIA interrogators immune from prosecution. This demonstrated clearly that they still intend to breach the fudge factor code that Bush has just signed to try and smokescreen the anti-torture lobby. They will torture people, that is in their nature. The US has become a ruthless death machine.

Joana Mariner of Human Rights Watch gave a good protest against this below the belt con that the US has just completed. BUT if organisations like HRW and Amnesty International hadn't pussy footed around so much in the past, perhaps it would have been impossible for Bush's team of demons and witches to get this far?

Still, with the dollar on the fall and massive debts the US is going to implode soon. The US will still likely be a potent force on the world stage but severely hampered by internal strife as those ordinary USans who have been screwed for so long by these corrupt presidents will rise again to try and restore the lost 'United States of America'

[1] http://rwor.org/downloads/file_info/download1.php?file=yoo_on_torture.mp3
[2] http://www.revereradio.net/e107/news.php?day.20070705
Anthrax Coverup: A Government Insider Speaks Out. Francis A. Boyle an expert on international law
[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Yoo
[4] http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article11488.htm

Its been a bumper weekend of things to moan about. I've been writing these ditties over the weekend....

Written: Saturday 21st July 10:10am

South Koreans have been captured in Afghanistan and news just in is that the second German has been killed. Why were the South Koreans there? The Afghan govt knew nothing about it. The reason is they are missionaries who sneaked into Afghanistan on the opportunity to try and pull people away from Islam. People in need make for ripe pickings.

I have come across a report about one and a half months ago (sorry I didn't record the source) that said medical treatment and food is offered to those if they declare they want to be a Christian, I'm very sure it was reporting about Afghanistan. This fuels my suspicion that the crusades never actually ended but rather smouldered on and on.

The mainstream media is reporting it as if the Taliban will kill the kidnapped South Koreans unless they withdraw their forces from Afghanistan. South Korea is said to have zero combat troops there but has medical and possibly support/logistical contingents.

South Korea is refusing the demand. So it's government has condemned those kidnapped to death. What a disgraceful and rotten position to take! How cold they are to the people they pretend to represent. How dare they refuse to act to protect the lives of their citizens. The required act is actually trivial. The swine’s refuse, but at the same time and without breaking into a filthy smirk like Bush does, they say they are going to pull out at the end of the year anyway. CAN YOU BELIEVE THAT? They are not even willing to accelerate the process by 5 months, the lives of those people is so expendable and irrelevant to these suits. YUCK! I feel sick.

If am convinced if there were relatives of South Koreas politicians who were kidnapped, there would be instant submission to the demands.

S. Korea has absolutely NO business being in Afghanistan. No one does. Afghanistan didn't do 9-11, it was the Zionist fringe {hell of a big fringe I know} within the neocon movement did it. The Taliban asked for proof of OBL's guilt. There wasn't any of course (it is admitted that it's not likely that the 'evidence' against OBL would lead to a successful conviction) so, the US invades the country. They had to you see, to stop derailment of their oil pipelines plan. The Taliban refused the pipeline deal before 9-11 in a meeting in Texas of all places. Amazing huh. Funny how the mainstream media, like BBC, CNN, FAUX NEWS don’t repeat that story isn't it?

Stories were flouted that Pakistan was being threatened with being bombed back to the stone age unless they joined the War OF Terror. The stories may be BS to make it look as if Musharaf was 'reluctant' to go out an kill people, but still, that the story broke and it was a Washington big wig (Rumsfeld I think) that threatened it was quite amazing.

The Afghan demand for S. Korea to get out therefore has legitimacy, but not the method they are employing to support that demand. The hostage taking of these people is I believe very wrong. It is irrelevant if Karzai gave S. Korea permission to be there because Karzai is purely and simply a US puppet. He has no authority to speak on behalf of the country. This reminds me the BBC's Louise Ducette in an interview with Karzai said what the Afghan people want most is justice. Karzai totally refused when asked if he would give them the justice the demanded. He's relying on these killers and the ordinary people hate them because of the misery they bring to their lives. Karzai is in bed with warlords, killers and heroin producers - just as his US bosses want.

And no I'm not call these Afghan captors Taliban, because I believe that it is a false label. The Taliban were annihilated primarily by the Americans and the British. What you see now in Afghanistan the Afghani resistance - Afghani citizens that want rid of the evil occupation, pilfering and polluting by way of depleted uranium of their country, similarly to the glorious resistance in Iraq who have the same aims.

Whether or not these evangelical new age missionaries were trying to convert people, I think there is absolutely no justification to kill them. If I was the Afghan resistance, I would perhaps keep them captive until and unless my demands were met. If the hunter-killer squads of the USUK arrested me and released the prisoners, then fair cop. That would be the price necessary to be paid to try and liberate my country from killers and drug traffickers.

Free speech.... Yet again... New European hypocrisy. A Spanish magazine has publshed a cartoon of a prince and princess having sex. Aparently the prince in the cartoon says something like 'If you get pregnant it'll be the first bit of work I've ever done in my life' The Spanish authorities have banned it. Despite being firecely anti-royal, I support the ban. Banning the cartoon isn't a restriction of freedom of speech becasue the message could have, and still can be, easily conveyed by other means. You just dont have to put an offensive and crass base level 'basic instinct' with it.

I wonder what the official Spanish reaction was to the cartons which insulted the prophet of Islam? What's the chanches that the Spanish government defended the publication of the insulting cartoons.

Just like the Spanish Prince's lazyness could have been delivered differently, grievences against Islam could also have been discused without the need for a insult.

The point is, whenever Islam is the target, it's OK. Every attack is defended; "freespeech" in this case, but whenever 'white' toes are trood on, then the offending toe tredder must stop.

Europeans must have the liberty to ware mini-skirts, thats "freechoice" Muslim women however must be liberated from being opressed and wearing hijabs and veils.

I have a vague recolletion of some Italian mayor banning 'fat' people from the beach or wearing bikini's or something.

Martin Somebody, the BBC's Africa correspondent said the allegations of sexual abuse by UN troops in Sierra Leone was understandable. The girls are desperate he said, some have children from other men. They have no other way to support themselves. They go to the UN base to get food and they end up flirting WHAAAAAT???? I nearly fell out of my chair when this scumbag said this. One would not be surprised if this man were to think that English female sex abuse victims were abused consequentially because flirting with their victim. But I can't imagine him saying that about empowered white women. Voiceless Black women on the other hand make for easy victims for predators like Moroccan UN troops and obnoxious BBC correspondents. Apologise pal.

The Iraq oil law up for passing:

Iraqi people (oops, forgot, Iraqi's arn't people, but in absence of a better description, let me use the term 'people' for now) don't want this wholly corrupt, undebated and unconstitutional law. Nobody wants it! - apart from the Brits and the USans, which explains why Al-Malaki pushed it through. It's against many Iraqi ministers desire too!

The oil law will carves the oil sector into essentially three zones which is what the USUK have been planning to do for some time already in terms of political administrations.

Kurdistan - (Turkey will invade - obviously too many illegal kurdish alphabet characters in that part of the world. Turkey and Israel want to share the oil, via pipeline through willing Jordan naturally enough. Shiahstan - in the south. They will sell USUKians who

will have to pay a lot for it. Sunnistan - a desert of depleted uranium and virtually no

oil.

Russia does not back the independence of Kosovo (in its current form) which was being discussed in the UN security council (UNSC). Russia has the power of veto and would have used it. So what does the USUK and brown-nosers do? They pull it out of the UN so that the non-UN group can try and get Kosovo to get independence as envisaged by the west, a group where Russia has no veto. Once again the USUK show us their respect for the UN. Perhaps this is what mass murderer Tony bLiar meant when he asked to 'move on' from the Iraq war - he wanted to move on to the next stage, level 2 if you like. of ignoring the UN.

About 10 years ago, Pfizer put poisonous chemicals in the bodies of Nigerian kids and killed 11 of them, but that doesn't matter because they were black right?. So of course, to kill 11 and injure others is all 'regrettable' to state the well used USUK default phrase. Regrettable because they could have been on a winner and made billions! Unfortunately the side effect: death, wasn't that easy to spin away.

But now, and this is the serious thing(!), the Nigerian government has re-filed a suite against Pfizer. Lets hope eh, that all the other brown and black countries that Pfizer does the same thing in, don’t get the same idea or they'll all be at it!

Turkey: Did you know Kurdish in its written form is illegal? I need to see my doctor about my ears because I didn't manage to hear anything of what must have been the usual strong outcry at free speech. Man my ears must be totally dead 'cos I didn't hear even a peep. Hope there is some ear miracle cure out there, 'cos I'm gonna need one.

Tourism slogan: "Aaah Turkey (where we didn't genocide the Armenians - honest!)"Perhaps Turks think Little Miss Moffat's eating habits were justified?. British tourists advised not to expect Robinsons Lemon xxxx served for brekkie.

And as I end this post, I find it amazing that the Turkish army made a statement saying it will not allow the Secular Attaturk state to fall. This statement was made in light of what they call and "Islamist" i.e. someone who believes in the religion of Islam might be elected by popular demand.

Again, where the hell was Europe demanding that the army stop making these threats in the face of a democratic decision by the people of Turkey? Shouldn't the EU be making preparations for action if the army does decide to destroy the will of the people? No of course they won't. Islam has to be thwarted.

Turkey is highly significant for the war of the Occidentals against Islam because it forms the boundary of the Islamic frontier.

I have believed for some time now that actually the crusades never ended. And indeed I have a fond a historical reference that supports my opinion. In 1919 the British General Allenby captured Jerusalem and on entering the city he proclaimed "the crusades were finally over". This finality is not taken literally by some but in context that it was a pivotal step in dismantling the Islamic Caliphate. What was perceived as Islamic power had now been destroyed.

Quick fact: In 1974 Turkey invaded Cyprus.

Sarkozy: "People are dying, people are suffering. It has to stop" He was talking about Iraq. OOOOPS! No sorry. He wasn't. Of course he wasn't, what kind of idiot are you for believing for one brief moment that he was? Iraqi's aren’t people. No one is dying. 700,000 haven’t died and they haven't been dying since 20th March 2003. Nor did 2,000,000 die from Frances joint participation in Bush 1's Desert storm rouse and the non-killing sanctions put in place from 1990.

Sarky was talking about the Darfour region in Sudan. An area that contains LARGE amounts of oil which the Chinese have the strongest foothold in and are busily pumping the oil away. Anyway, the Sudanese are black therefore their killing is inconsequential, and the position of "big white boss" has been vacant for far too long. Oh yes, how could I forget? The Sudanese are Muslims so QUICK! get them euro skins in there NOW!

Cynicism aside, lets just hope whatever they do does actually bring benefit to people there.

LOL. Musharraf accepts Supreme courts decision to reinstate Top Judge Chaudhry.

LOL LOL LOL!!!!

Like the scumbag had any choice! There lucky enough that the 100+ people they slaughtered a couple of weeks ago and the false flag they pulled a few days ago hadn't already seen their sorry little bodies languishing in the cells of the Karachi cop bovver boys. To have rejected the courts decision would have been far worse! and deservedly so. Now lets just hope Chaudhry isn't a yet another fake and imposed bipolar opposite.

Thud Crack Slap
Who's your mother now punk?
God's in my toilet
DONT LOOK AT ME, NEVER LOOK AT ME
I can free you, you know
I know you knew him, we know everything
You knew him didn't you? what did you do?
DONT LOOK AT ME, NEVER LOOK AT ME
Thud. Thud Thud
Your gonna die here, don't you miss your family?
You know, your little sister's being bullied in school
DONT EVEN THINK ABOUT IT!
You're serving your God here?
What's the difference between us, were the same.
Slap Thud
So what do you think of the weather in Gloucester?

In some ways I am happy to have knowledge of the crimes of my country. That way, I can stand with clear conscience and refuse to have anything to do with the living nightmare the UK establishment was bequeathed upon a myriad of nations, involving hundreds of millions of victims stretching across the world over hundreds of years.

Almost everything the UK govt does these days, and how it is reported in the mainstream media (loosely, very loosely!, termed 'news' by some) contains the most potty propaganda. According to http://www.news.com.au, the British newspaper "The Times" is reported to have said of 2 Russian bombers flying in international waters near Britain that it

smacked of "old-fashioned sabre-rattling" on the part of the Russian military and revived "the spirit of the Cold War" in the North Atlantic.

Although there are many questions about 'who' really controls or plays a heavy hand in Russian affairs, from where I'm standing, it's the UK coupled with the US) that's crashing relationships to the low's of the past.

How come the UK foreign policy ALWAYS so dismal? You couldn't have a worse foreign policy even if you tried.

Examplory BBC mind numbing dross.

The BBC isn't fair on many things involving the British establishment, the US or the zionists savagely occupying Palestine. Research and studies have found a western bais against Palestinians and in favour of the zionist vampires who drink deeply from the blood of Palestinians {not to mention the reports of them harvesting Palestinian organs}.

So here's an example.

BBC says: "But hopes are high in some circles that the former British prime minister, who stepped down last month, will be able to make real progress toward peace."
source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6905843.stm

Comment: And there are probably many more circles, each one, twenty times bigger, that believe multiple killer, Tony bLiar taking up this position is some kind of ultra sick joke that will only aid to the misery and suffering of the Palestinian people at the behest of killer bLiar's Zionist buddies.

Having murdered 100+ of their own countrymen in Islamabad recently, undemocratic, unelected US puppet, Pervez Musharraf realised his grip on power was very tenuous. The people were getting more angry at him. No doubt some army generals were thinking 'is it time to get rid of dictator Musharraf?'

Cue the false flag.
What better way to minimise loss of dictatorial power by using the tried and tested divide and conquer tactic.

Musharraf tried to Pervez pervert Pervez the judiciary and the Lawyers were having none of it, so better to get the so called 'radicals' to start attacking the lawyers.

Wonder if Musharraf thought of it himself of perhaps Cheney conveyed it to him via the PAK branch of the CIA - the ISI???

Whenever I hear the term "groups linked to Al-Qaeda”, I start laughing. The term is banded around much like 'anti-Semite' in that it's grossly over-used for political purposes. The USUK unholy alliance would love nothing more than for people to believe it exists, a dark murderous tyrannical force swarming across the globe, just waiting to activate their sleeper cells, who at the first opportunity are going to slice off your head while you sleep and kill the rest of your family.

Adam Curtis has researched the origins of ‘Al-Qaeda’ and found the term was invented simply to allow US lawyers to prosecution of some Muslims in the US in their absence. US law says they can be prosecuted if they can be shown to be a member of an outlawed group. So the US named-up Al-Qaeda, drawing from a list of names from the Mujahadeen who fought the Soviets in Afghanistan. The same Mujahadeen who Ronald Regan stood beside and praised in front of the worlds media declaring them to be glorious “freedom fighters” but now are the very same people who now, we are told, must frighten the living daylights out of us.

But tell me, what does LINKS to Al-Qaeda actually mean? Tell me what these bloody links are. TELL ME! I demand it. Who decides there is a link? You