Search blog.co.uk

Archives for: September 2007

Dispicable Kerry

by lwtc247 @ 19. Sep 2007 - 15:57:28

american civilian hero


USZan zero

John Kerry is an atrocitiy of a politician.

You might be more familiar with what others have reported is his real name: Judas Kohn the Jewish(Z) name he forgot before the last presidental election. Thats right. He forgot his brother was a practicing Jew(Z) also. Oh humm, the things we forget.

Anyway, Chick onto this actual NEWS site and not this fake news your western Zionist killers beam into your brain every second of the day.
The NEWS site is Information Clearing House.
Here;s the directy URL to the particular news story:

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18418.htm

A courageous man had the balls to stand up and ask Kerry some searching questions, sush as why did he conceed the election even though the idiot managed to get more votes than Bush and he probably knew of the actions of swine like Karl Rove in trying to stop the Aunt Sally from actually winning the election. He Refers to Greg Pallasts book "Armed Madhouse" which despite Pallasts cunning tricks, dished the dirt on Washintontons law-making law-breakers. The man was hassled early on and eventually had the mic he spoke into, cut off when he asked Kerry about Skull and bones. The man pleaded for help. NOBODY helped him. These STUPID USANs, those who pretend to stand up for freedom, democracy and accountability - They dont care one jot. Selfish pigs. This man is a damn hero. Its true American patriots like him who should make up the political class in America.

Kerry the utter disgrace of a man, stood there while the man was assaulted and tazered. Only one woman came to his defence when the familiar clicks of the Taser pulsed massive voltages into his chest.

What a disgrace of a Politican. What a mockery of Democracy, what a repugnant bunch of apathetic clueless US citizens.

Can't you see the Brimstone USans? Won't you wake up from the rotton illusion you are living, or are your SUV's and couch potato chips more imporatant than honesty and justice.


 
 

Computer woes.

by lwtc247 @ 19. Sep 2007 - 10:58:56

Why is it that people who know virtually nothing about computers, don't seem to have their computers manfunction as much as those who do know something about computers???

Well as you can tell, I have computer probs. HINT: Avoid Packard Bell laptop! Mines been nowt but problems, many are liveable with but not the frozen is spacetime problem!

I have to finish this post before it freezes again, which is a great pity as the number of NAUGHTY and comment worthy things that have been happening in the world of global politics lately has been huge! and my other computer has a bloody virus and somehow blocks blog.co.uk. GURRR.

All I can suggest until I end up buying a new second hand PC or laptop (remember I've got a botcott to persue) is that you go to Stef's blog (famous for 15 megapixels, Alex Fear's Abandon all Fear and Steph's blog (wordpress) for a good blogging! Update: Should have Included Ian's Blog: cishanjia.blog.co.uk and another Ian's site: machiavelli.blog.co.uk/ being other regular haunts worthy of a visit, as is the new antireptilian.blog.co.uk/

Looking at my stats, I see a loyal readership - Thanks for that. I appreciate it.

Will try and be back soon!

Oooh great. More bombs.

by lwtc247 @ 11. Sep 2007 - 20:48:15

MOSCOW, September 11 (RIA Novosti) - Russia has tested a thermobaric/vacuum bomb, otherwise known as a fuel-air bomb, that is the most powerful in the world, a top military official said Tuesday.

Known as a vacuum bomb, it uses a fuel-air explosive and can create overpressures equal to an atomic bomb, said Alexander Rukshin, deputy chief of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces.

"It is environmentally friendly, compared to a nuclear bomb, and it will enable us to ensure national security and at the same time stand up to international terrorism in any part of the globe and in any situation," he said.

He stressed that the bomb does not violate any of the international agreements that Russia has signed.

http://en.rian.ru/russia/20070911/78058645.html

UPDATE: You can see footage of it here: http://www.abc.net.au/news/video/2007/09/12/2030843.htm

Why not change your TV channel

by lwtc247 @ 11. Sep 2007 - 17:09:42

seeing as the Zionist media is poisoning your mind!

Should you not feel angry when you see pictures of US soldiers mourning the dead of 9-11 - AN ACT THEIR GOVERNMENT DID, and then use that to fuel their slaughter fest through Afghanistan and Iraq?

Should you not feel angry at the way YOUR media tries to make you feel empathy for them but IGNORES the demonic acts of the US and UK for well over a hundred years now?

Should you not feel angry that YOUR media REFUSES to challenge or provide an alternative view point about the US administrations banquet of gross slaughter?

Tune into something that kicks the USUK propaganda broadcasting in YOUR country into the dirt where it belongs.

Irans press tv - 9-11 poll

Do your brains a favour as well as truely honour the dead of 9-11, before 9-11 and after 9-11, all over the world.

Try Press TV (Irans News Channel in English)
Or Al Jazeera in English

More than one Sept 11

by lwtc247 @ 11. Sep 2007 - 11:59:52

As the the Jewish killings in WW2 have obscured the far greater losses and sufferings of the Russians and Chinese during WW2, to most people there is only one 9-11.

They couldn't be more wrong. A hideous act 6 years ago, triggered a set of much more deadly events built on a mountain of lies and barbarity. It is not the only Sept 11 we should be knowledgeable of, despite it being the only one the mainstream media ever talk about.

Please watch the Lecture entitled "Come September"
given by one of my hero's, the fantastic Arundhati Roy, on Sept 2002,
In the presence of another hero, the equally fantastic American historian,
the great Howard Zinn.

Arundhati Roy
Arundhati Roy

Video:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=945405493000735497 (44 minutes)
Transcript (htm): http://www.nmazca.com/verba/roy.htm
Transcript (pdf): grace.evergreen.edu/~arunc/texts/politics/comeSeptember.pdf

See Also: "We", a documentary/multimedia presentaion based on the "Come
September" speech:
http://www.archive.org/download/resistcomauWehighquality/We_Arundhati_Roy__256k.wmv (101Mb)
or google: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4100322562082185221

United we stand.
Divided, they kill.

UPDATE:
It has come to my attention that the link to video is a bit haphazard. Google video it seems, is increasingly hard to get these days.

Here's some alternatives:

1) http://www.lannan.org/lf/cf/detail/2002-prize-for-cultural-freedom-roy/
or here.
2) http://www.weroy.org/video_come_september.shtml

The occupation of Palestine and the UN

by lwtc247 @ 08. Sep 2007 - 00:05:08

This vile monstor - The situation of occupied palestine, given a virgin birth by its British mum and sustained by its US step dad is the defacto power centre of the world. The US and UK political centres of power succumbed long ago to the tyrranical idea - that of a ruthless and Godless state adopting the sham name of a previous centre of Global power - The historical and glorious state of monotheastic Israel of David and Solomon.

Although their power is vast, it is tenuous. Hanging like a thread which prevents it from falling onto the purifying lava. The thread is successful though and is primarily comprised of financial strength.

But even this hasn't been able to enable its evil path of global domination pass unscathed, as one poster at the following website: http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru

by Throw_Off_The_Killer on 07.09.2007 [14:52 ]

Let's check the record of UN resolutions;

1) Dec. 18 1978 #33/110 Requests for report on the living conditions of Palestinians in occupied Arab countries.
110-2 US, Israel vote no.

2) Dec. 18 1978 #33/113C Condemnation of Israeli human rights record in occupied territories.
97-3 US, Israel, Guatemala vote no.

3) Nov. 23 1979 #34/83J Return of inhabitants expelled by Israel.
121-3 US, Israel, Australia vote no

4) Dec. 12 1979 #34/90A Demand that Israel desist from certain human rights violations.
111-2 US, Israel vote no.

5) Dec. 14 1979 #34/133 Assistance to Palestinian people.
112-3 US, Israel, Canada vote no.

6) Dec. 17 1979 #34/160 Include Palestinian women in agenda of UN Conference on Women.
122-2 US, Israel vote no.

7) Nov. 3 1980 #35/13E Requests Israel to return displaced persons.
96-3 US, Israel, Canada vote no.

8) Dec. 15 1980 #35/169C To further the "inalienable rights of the Palestinian people."
120-3 US, Israel, Australia vote no.

9) Oct. 28 1981 #36/15 Demand Israel cease excavations of certain sites in East Jerusalem.
114-2 US, Israel vote no

10) Dec. 9 1981 #36/87B Establish a nuclear-free zone in the Middle East.
107-2 US, Israel vote no.

11) Dec. 16 1981 #36/146A Demands Israel desist from removal and resettlement of Palestinian refugees in the Gaza Strip and from destroying their shelters.
141-2 US, Israel vote no

12) Dec. 16 1981 #36/146C Palestinian refugees are entitled to the revenue derived from their property.
117-2 US, Israel vote no

13) Dec. 16 1981 #36/146G Establish a University of Jerusalem for Palestinian refugees.
119-2 US, Israel vote no.

It is also worth noting that whenever a UN Resolution condemning South African Apartheid appeared, Israel always abstained from voting, while the US consistently voted "no".

These are but a few examples demonstrating how the whole world is united against Israeli and the US.

United against Zionists.

source: http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/140324

Strange case of the vanishing posts

by lwtc247 @ 07. Sep 2007 - 13:34:25


Below is a copy of a post regarding Craig Murrays Blog.

Now I think Craig is is a clever bloke, but perhaps you disagree? The below post which was pulled from his website I believe is a good example of how clever he is. Please read it. See the use of words that flow together nicely as well as efficient sentence construction. After you've read it, why not post it on your website and challenge others to see if they too can see how clever Craig is.

There is actually a 2nd post after Murrays. I think that other post is clever too. What do you think?

---------------------

I thought I should make my views on Alisher Usmanov quite plain to you. You are unlikely to see much plain talking on Usmanov elsewhere in the media becuase he has already used his billions and his lawyers in a pre-emptive strike. They have written to all major UK newspapers, including the latter:

"Mr Usmanov was imprisoned for various offences under the old Soviet regime. We wish to make it clear our client did not commit any of the offences with which he was charged. He was fully pardoned after President Mikhail Gorbachev took office. All references to these matters have now been expunged from police records . . . Mr Usmanov does not have any criminal record."

Let me make it quite clear that Alisher Usmanov is a criminal. He was in no sense a political prisoner, but a gangster and racketeer who rightly did six years in jail. The lawyers cunningly evoke "Gorbachev", a name respected in the West, to make us think that justice prevailed. That is completely untrue.

Usmanov's pardon was nothing to do with Gorbachev. It was achieved through the growing autonomy of another thug, President Karimov, at first President of the Uzbek Soviet Socilist Republic and from 1991 President of Uzbekistan. Karimov ordered the "Pardon" because of his alliance with Usmanov's mentor, Uzbek mafia boss and major international heroin overlord Gafur Rakimov. Far from being on Gorbachev's side, Karimov was one of the Politburo hardliners who had Gorbachev arrested in the attempted coup that was thwarted by Yeltsin standing on the tanks outside the White House.

Usmanov is just a criminal whose gangster connections with one of the World's most corrupt regimes got him out of jail. He then plunged into the "privatisation" process at a time when gangster muscle was used to secure physical control of assets, and the alliance between the Russian Mafia and Russian security services was being formed.

Usmanov has two key alliances. he is very close indeed to President Karimov, and especially to his daughter Gulnara. It was Usmanov who engineered the 2005 diplomatic reversal in which the United States was kicked out of its airbase in Uzbekistan and Gazprom took over the country's natural gas assets. Usmanov, as chairman of Gazprom Investholdings paid a bribe of $88 million to Gulnara Karimova to secure this. This is set out on page 366 of Murder in Samarkand.

Alisher Usmanov had risen to chair of Gazprom Investholdings because of his close personal friendship with Putin, He had accessed Putin through Putin's long time secretary and now chef de cabinet, Piotr Jastrzebski. Usmanov and Jastrzebski were roommates at college. Gazprominvestholdings is the group that handles Gazproms interests outside Russia, Usmanov's role is, in effect, to handle Gazprom's bribery and sleaze on the international arena, and the use of gas supply cuts as a threat to uncooperative satellite states.

Gazprom has also been the tool which Putin has used to attack internal democracy and close down the independent media in Russia. Gazprom has bought out - with the owners having no choice - the only independent national TV station and numerous rgional TV stations, several radio stations and two formerly independent national newspapers. These have been changed into slavish adulation of Putin. Usmanov helped accomplish this through Gazprom. The major financial newspaper, Kommersant, he bought personally. He immediately replaced the editor-in-chief with a pro-Putin hack, and three months later the long-serving campaigning defence correspondent, Ivan Safronov, mysteriously fell to his death from a window.

All this, both on Gazprom and the journalist's death, is set out in great detail here:
http://www.craigmurray.co.uk/archives/2007/06/russian_journal.html

Usmanov is also dogged by the widespread belief in Uzbekistan that he was guilty of a particularly atrocious rape, which was covered up and the victim and others in the know disappeared. The sad thing is that this is not particularly remarkable. Rape by the powerful is an everyday hazard in Uzbekistan, again as outlined in Murder in Samarkand page 120. If anyone has more detail on the specific case involving Usmanov please add a comment.

I reported back in 2002 or 2003 in an Ambassadorial top secret telegram to the Foreign Office that Usmanov was the most likely favoured successor of President Karimov as totalitarian leader of Uzbekistan. I also outlined the Gazprom deal (before it happened) and the present by Usmanov to Putin (though in Jastrzebski's name) of half of Mapobank, a Russian commercial bank owned by Usmanov. I will never forget the priceless reply from our Embassy in Moscow. They said that they had never even heard of Alisher Usmanov, and that Jastrzebski was a jolly nice friend of the Ambassador who would never do anything crooked.

Sadly, I expect the football authorities will be as purblind. Football now is about nothing but money, and even Arsenal supporters - as tight-knit and homespun a football community as any - can be heard saying they don't care where the money comes from as long as they can compete with Chelsea.

I fear that is very wrong. Letting as diseased a figure as Alisher Usmanov into your club can only do harm in the long term.

03-Sep-07

Arsenal [ 03-Sep-07 10:47am ] [ T ] [ G ] [ N ] [ L ]

I have been delighted by the reaction of Arsenal fans - the large majority seem not to want Usmanov's money, and juging by yesterday's performance they don't need it.

I am most happy to give evidence to the Premier League if anyone can point me in the right direction. But I rather hope Usmanov's hyperactive and expensive lawyers will sue me for libel. Questioning Usmanov in a British court would bring a much fairer result than anything I expect from our tainted football authorities.

02-Sep-07

Alisher Usmanov, etc etc. Post removed at the request of lawyers

-------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
-------------------------------------

And below is the other, 2nd. clever post.

Alisher Usmanov, Arsenal wannabe owner's criminal past unearthed by Uzbek ex HM Ambassador Craig Murray

Voidstar runs an RSS feed on Craig Murrays blog and the above has just appeared. Julian Bond at Craig Murray's blog in a comment explains it thus ;

You may know that I republish your RSS feed on my UK Political Blog Aggregator http://www.voidstar.com/ukpoliblog/index.php?fid=269
In a somewhat surprising turn of events, some lawyers phoned me up and asked that I remove the copy of this article re-posted there.
It seems that your wish for a libel action may well be granted.

The cause of this is a post from Craig Murray about the purchase by Alisher Usmanov of David Dein's shares in a third rate London football team called Arsenal which Lord Patel referred to last Saturday, September 1st in a post about how London is filing up with fugitive Russian billionaire criminals - further and better particulars of the details of the transaction can be found in this report by AFP.

Craig Murray's estimable piece is entitled (characteristically challenging, and crystal clear in content and intent)

Alisher Usmanov, potential Arsenal chairman, is a Vicious Thug, Criminal, Racketeer, Heroin Trafficker and Accused Rapist

Apparently in a letter from Mr Usmanov's lawyers (no name provided) to London's finest press barons (no date or signatory given) they are quoted , saying inter alia

“Mr Usmanov (see pic - click to enlarge) was imprisoned for various offences under the old Soviet regime. We wish to make it clear our client did not commit any of the offences with which he was charged. He was fully pardoned after President Mikhail Gorbachev took office. All references to these matters have now been expunged from police records . . . Mr Usmanov does not have any criminal record.”


Craig, who has wide long and deep experience and contacts in these matters, states unequivocally ..."Let me make it quite clear that Alisher Usmanov is a criminal. He was in no sense a political prisoner, but a gangster and racketeer who rightly did six years in jail. The lawyers cunningly evoke "Gorbachev", a name respected in the West, to make us think that justice prevailed. That is completely untrue."

He then goes on to describe in some detail how Usmanov he has built up his vast empire of Gazprom as a sidekick of President Putin bribing the beautiful Gulnara Karimova , the daughter of President Karimov of Uzbekistan with US$88 ,with the help of people like his old college roomate and Putin's chef de cabinet, Piotr Jastrzebski and connections through president Karimov of Mafiosis and international heroin overlord Gafur Rakimov.

Gazprom was of course involved in seizing Russian Press and TV - including Komersant The major financial newspaper, Kommersant, which Usmanov bought personally, sacked the editor-in-chief and replaced him with with a pro-Putin hack - long-serving campaigning defence correspondent, Ivan Safronov (pic) , died after another Muscovite Mafia motivated de-fenestration.(More details in another post here) also see here "Ivan Safronov Was Killed" - No suicide note was found. His expensive cellular telephone and his wallet, with money in it, were found on the body.

Finally Craig Murray claims.."Usmanov is also dogged by the widespread belief in Uzbekistan that he was guilty of a particularly atrocious rape, which was covered up and the victim and others in the know disappeared. "

He recommends that the Arsenal fans ( a rare breed for this struggling minnow) see off Usmanov, which given the Byzantine complexity of the shareholdings is easier said than done.(Board members:Diamond dealer Danny Fiszman 24%Lady Bracewell-Smith 15.8% Richard Carr 4.35% Peter Hill-Wood 0.8% Others:David Dein 14.5% Stan Kroenke 11.26% Small investors 18.03%)David Dein's son is also married into the Buchler family who run another third rate London club called Tottenham Hotspurs... and they all jolly pally with people like Karaoke King Lord Levy "Make mine a bronet", and stockbroker Mr Barry Townsend who wasn't made one after lending New Labour a £Million.

Was this to be the 'dirty bomb'?

by lwtc247 @ 06. Sep 2007 - 20:24:28

NOTE: See MISSING NUKE UPDATE BELOW!

Regular readers of this quiet corner of the internet will know that I've been forced by the tyrants based in Washington, London and occupied Palestine, to live with the conspiracy 24/7, having been freed from the mental shackles imposed upon me throughout the early stages of my life.

Those who similarly have managed to become free, and also must live with the associated pain the truth brings, will not have escaped the exponential proliferation of the evil puffs of bad smelling air from the mouth of BW BuSh and the other enslaved (willingly?) politicians on capitol hill, in the US enslaved media and in London recently.

The attack on Iran has been planned for a long time, and while a stubborn portion of me doesn't believe Iran will be attacked (see: www.the-al-kahf-code.blogspot.com, http://the-unifond-organization.blogspot.com/) the majority of me does. As it also seems like one of my respected teachers (www.imranhosein.org/) thinks likewise.

I have proposed for a long time that the US will use similar tacitics of utter lies to attack Iran as it did Iraq. Bush used the operation his buddies, squatting in Palestine, conducted 9-11, attaching it to Iraq to fool the so easily fooled US population in passivity and pale agreement, in order to destroy the lives of 20m+ Iraqi's and leave them with a film of depleted uranium to last them until the end of the earth.

We have also seen the British government conduct its own (with help from the same buddies squatting in Palestine) act of state terror on the civilians of Britain on 7th July 2007 to attempt to justify its participation in the neo-crusades and quell significant British anger at just what a demon mass killer Tony bLiar's government had turned out to be.

But there has been no 9-11 to pin onto Iran.

Liar and butcher of humans, GW BuSh, in chorus with his 9th level demons have long feared the population into preparing for the day a nuclear explosion is carried out against the US of Z, by 'terrorists' who have appeared from a vacuum despite Caucasian global benevolence.

So was the utterly obscene "US B-52 in nuclear cargo blunder" a dummy run of the false flag. I hate to think yes, but its what my bones tell me.

UPDATE:
24-10-07

There have been a number of very interesting stories about this incodent. I'll post one here from globalresearch:

Nukes Over America: Just a Stupid Mistake. Sure It Is
by Dave Lindorff

Global Research, October 21, 2007
AfterDowningStreet.org

The Air Force’s Friday report on the August 29-30 nuclear weapons incident which saw six armed cruise missiles flown across the continental US in launch position on a B-52H bomber leaves all the big questions unanswered, attempting to shuck the whole thing off as an “unacceptable mistake.”

To be sure, Air Force Secretary Michael W. Wynne and Air Force Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations Maj. Gen. Richard Newton, said that after a six-week investigation, five officers, including Col. Bruce Emig, commander of the Fifth Bomb Group at Minot AFB in North Dakota, where the flight originated, have been relieved of duty, and 65 other Air Force personnel were also removed from their duties, and both Barksdale and Minot were decertified for their strategic nuclear responsibilities. But that’s still pretty small beer for an incident so serious it’s never happened before in half a century of nuclear weapons handling.

There are, at this point, no court martials being contemplated, and nobody’s been discharged from the military.

Put simply, six 150-kiloton warheads were improperly attached to six Advanced Cruise Missiles, all loaded onto a wing launch pod, and then mounted on the wing of a B-52 H Stratofortress at Minot, along with six similar missiles with dummy warheads, which were loaded onto a launch pod on the plane’s other wing, an all 12 were improperly and illegally flown across the country to Barksdale AFB in Louisiana.

The Air Force, following its “investigation,” is saying the same thing it said before the investigation: it was all a big “mistake”—the result of “widespread disregard for the rules” regarding handling of nuclear weapons.

A few guys at Minot “inexplicably” screwed up and loaded the nukes and then there were a chain of mistakes because no one else treated the nuclear-tipped missiles as if they were armed with nuclear weapons.

The trouble with this theory, or story line if you will, is that while nobody at Minot, supposedly, noticed what was happening—even though ground crew workers spent eight hours laboring to get the pod with the six nuke-tipped missiles mounted on the plane’s wing. This despite the warheads are clearly visible and identifiable by the silver coating they exhibit when viewed through a little window in each nosecone cover, and because there are red coverings on the nuke nosecones—once the plane got to Barksdale, the ground crew there, which had no reason on earth to suspect it was looking at nuclear warheads, spotted them immediately upon going to the plane.
They had no reason to expect nukes because for 40 years it has been illegal for the military to carry nuclear weapons on bombers over US territory, and indeed since 1991, it has been illegal to even load nuclear weapons on a plane, period, even for training purposes on the ground.

How can it be that Air Force ground crew people at Barksdale could spot the nukes in a flash while nobody at Minot—not the workers who mounted the warheads on the missiles in the heavily guarded bunker, not the guards who are supposed to guard those weapons with their lives and prevent any unauthorized removal from the bunkers, not the ground crew that loaded them onto the plan, and not the pilot and crew of the bomber, who are supposed to check every missile before they take off—noticed they were nuclear warheads? (The weapons went unnoticed for 10 hours in Barksdale, but that’s only because no groundcrew visited the plane for that long, but when they did go to it, they reportedly spotted the nukes right off the bat.)

The Air Force, at a press conference announcing the results of its investigation, didn’t answer this question. It appears they reporters at the session didn’t ask it either.

Certainly the AP reporter didn’t ask it, because if she had, she would surely have included the Air Force’s answer, or it’s non-answer, in her story.

Nobody, apparently, asked the Air Force either about six mysterious violent deaths of Air Force personnel from Minot and Barksdale, and from a mysterious Air Force Special Commando Group, all of which occurred in the days and weeks immediately before, during and after the incident. Two of those deaths—of the Special Commando Group officer and of a Minot weapons guard—were reportedly “suicides.”

In an article in the current issue of American Conservative magazine, currently on newsstands, I report that incredibly, no federal investigators from the Pentagon or the federal government even bothered to contact the police investigators or medical examiners who investigated those six deaths—an remarkable failure of due diligence, given the seriousness of this incident.

One retired Navy officer who contacted me during my investigation, who worked in electronic warfare, told me it would be simply impossible for those weapons to have been moved out of the storage bunker. He claims to know for a certainty that all nuclear weapons in the US arsenal are equipped with high-tech tags (“like they have at WalMart and Kmart only better”) that would instantly trigger alarms when the weapons are moved, unless they were deliberately disarmed.

So what we have is pretty clearly a cover-up here.

A cover-up of what though?

Here we’re into speculation.

One thing we need to keep in mind is that Barksdale AFB, on its website, advertises itself proudly as the base that prepares B-52s for duty in the Middle East Theater.

Another thing we need to keep in mind is that Vice President Dick Cheney is trying hard to gin up a war against Iran, against the better judgment of top military leaders and Defense Secretary Robert Gates.

And a third thing to remember is that these particular six warheads, called M80-1 warheads, are able to be adjusted to have a power of anywhere from 150 kilotons down to just 5 kilotons—a so-called “tactical” size.

Perfect for a tactical strike on an Iranian nuclear processing or research site, or for a “false flag” type attack that could be blamed on a fledgling nuclear power…like Iran.

Of course this is all speculation.

What we do know is that for 36 hours, six nuclear warheads went missing. Nobody at the Pentagon in authority knew they were gone or where they were. And when they were discovered, the initial Pentagon response was to cover it all up. The only reason we know about this incident is that three Air Force officers became whistle-blowers and contacted a reporter at Military Times, a private newspaper trusted by and popular with the rank-and-file military.

And what we know is that this couldn’t have been what the Air Force, six weeks and one “investigation” late, is calling a “mistake.”

Dave Lindorff is a Philadelphia-based investigative journalist and columnist. His latest book, co-authored by Barbara Olshansky, is “The Case for Impeachment” (St. Martin’s Press, 2006 and now out in paperback). His work is available at www.thiscantbehappening.net

One analyst called Gord, writes about this:

The original leak was that 6 nukes left Minot, Five were reported to have sat on the tarmac at Barksdale. Now all the stories say 6 arrived at Barksdale. Why the difference?

I still expect a 5 kt nuke to explode near Tel Aviv, killing mostly Arabs, and providing an excuse for attacking Iran.

Following on from what Gord wrote is this WORRYING article:

MISSING NUKE!.......MISSING NUKE!.......MISSING NUKE!
MISSING NUKE!.......MISSING NUKE!.......MISSING NUKE!
MISSING NUKE!.......MISSING NUKE!.......MISSING NUKE!

Is a Second More Deadly 9/11 Now In the Works? There Are Good Reasons to Believe This Is So.
by Richard Franklin

10/22/07


As you know, a B-52 bomber was equipped with six nuclear warheads mounted on Advanced Cruise Missiles and then flown from Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota to Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana on August 30. They were mounted on the wings of the bomber.

According to Michael Madsen's sources, a group of officers within the US Air Force became aware of the theft of these missiles and their nuclear warheads and intercepted them at Barksdale.

After this event somehow leaked to the media, the White House apparently scrambled to concoct a story to account for the theft. They came up with a lulu. They told us it was all a 'mistake'. The six nuclear warheads had been mistakenly mounted on Advanced Cruise Missiles, which were then mistakenly mounted on the wings of the B-52, and then mistakenly flown to Louisiana. If we are to believe the White House's absurd story, nobody among the crew of the bomber was even aware of the deadly cargos attached to the wings of their aircraft.

Wayne Madsen has reported that the nukes were destined for Iraq, but were intercepted by renegade officers of the US Air Force who are opposed to attacking Iran with nuclear warheads in a plan that was devised and was being allegedly overseen by Dick Cheney. According to Madsen, a U.S. attack on Iran using nuclear weapons was scheduled to coincide with Israel's September 6 air attack on a reputed Syrian nuclear facility in Dayr az-Zwar in northern Syria. The interception of the nuclear warheads apparently caused the White House cabal to defer an American coordination with the Israeli attack until such time as the problem of the intercepted nukes was resolved on the domestic front.

The activist group Citizens for Legitimate Government has come up with an astounding revelation that has been ignored by our controlled media. A spokesperson for the group has indicated that six members of the US Air Force who were directly involved in loading or transporting the missiles, were killed within 7 days of the Barksdale interception. Their deaths have been ruled 'accidents'. I repeat, these deaths happened within 7 days of the incident! The odds against this happening are mind boggling.

The victims according to CLG include Airman First Class Todd Blue, 20, who died while on leave in Virginia. A husband and wife from Barksdale Air Force Base were killed on Shreveport-Blanchard Highway while riding a motorcycle. Adam Barrs, a 20-year-old airman from Minot Air Force Base was killed in a crash on the outskirts of the city. First Lt. Weston Kissel, 28, a Minot Air Force Base bomber pilot, was killed in a motorcycle crash in Tennessee. Police found the body of a missing Air Force captain John Frueh near Badger Peak in northeast Skamania County, Washington.

It has been surmised by many that those directing the nuclear thefts embarked on a cleanup operation to silence any persons who were not part of the conspiracy but had knowledge of exactly what had gone down at Minot and Barksdale Air Force Bases. It defies common sense to come up with any other explanation for the six deaths, a figure that may already be out of date. Any further deaths may quite possibly be kept from the media.

While the White House has concocted a coverup story to explain the, theft of six Advanced Cruise Missiles carrying nuclear warheads, it has not explained why it is that six such missiles were loaded at Minot, but ONLY FIVE ARRIVED AT BARKSDALE! There is only one possible explanation. Somewhere between the Minot and Barksdale, the plane landed to deliver one missile with its warhead.

So who would want a solitary weapon of this nature? And for what purpose? I propose the following scenario. Members of the PNAC (usually pronounced as 'pee-nack') cabal in the White House wanted such a missile for the commission of a second major false flag operation in the United States.

But why would they want to inflict another 9/11 on this country? It seems clear enough to me. They are now on the precipice of losing the power they have worked for so many years to achieve. Now with a unitary president in place, a chain of concentration camps across the country manned by Blackwater thugs, after having done practice runs to massively act out arresting dissident American citizens, with Bush in possession of a law giving him the right to declare martial law and also empowered to seize total, direct control of the National Guard, and so on, the PNAC cabal is in perfect position to deliver the final blow in the creation of an openly authoritarian state.

I can think of no other logical reason for having purloined a nuclear warhead along with an Advanced Cruise Missile. That nuke and the missile remain missing despite White House assurances they are looking for it. In my humble opinon, the people who have that nuke and missile in hand are quite possibly planning a second 9/11 to complete the grand design they first started working toward during the Reagan years. It was then that they drafted their Project for a New American Century to brazenly announce to the world where they were headed. We now may be on the precipice of the final act in the creation of a new Empire Amerika.

I have never more sincerely wanted to be proved wrong. I hope my reasoning is crazy, my facts are wrong, and I'm merely going through a phase. Those feelings, however, do not suffice to allay the dark thoughts that come to mind regarding what I see as a truly scary event.

-###-

French Translation: http://www.alterinfo.net/Est-ce-qu-un-second-11-septembre-encore-plus-meurtrier-est-en-preparation-_a12747.html

October 22, 2007 Mr. Franklin is the author of "The Mythology of Self-Worth"

COMMENTS on that site:

Comment from: Joe Wheeler [Member]
I searched the entire Citizens for Legitimate Government site to check out the "astounding revelation" recounted in this article, and it wasn't there, at least using Google's site search didn't bring it up using several different keywords that would narrow it down. There were several other articles pertaining to the B-52 nuke loaded missiles, but no story about 6 USAF crew people being offed within a week of the incident.

Two possibilities: Franklin has his sources mixed up, or there has been some kind of censorship.

I don't know what to make of it, but this isn't the 1st account of assassinations of people in the military for knowing too much or speaking out; here is a short bit from Naomi Wolf's article at Common Dreams called "American Tears":

I read the news in a state of something like walking shock: seven soldiers wrote op-eds critical of the war — in The New York Times; three are dead, one shot in the head. A female soldier who was about to become a whistleblower, possibly about abuses involving taxpayers’ money: shot in the head. Pat Tillman, who was contemplating coming forward in a critique of the war: shot in the head. Donald Vance, a contractor himself, who blew the whistle on irregularities involving arms sales in Iraq — taken hostage FROM the U.S. Embassy BY U.S. soldiers and kept without recourse to a lawyer in a U.S. held-prison, abused and terrified for weeks — and scared to talk once he got home. Another whistleblower in Iraq, as reported in Vanity Fair: held in a trailer all night by armed contractors before being ejected from the country.
Frustratingly, no footnotes or links, and in Franklin's case the group he quotes don't have the putative information on their site.
10/22/07 @ 23:35


Comment from: Daniel Smythe [Member]
· http://seeking-utopia.blogspot.com
Because of the type of crazed people who are currently running America, this article, which under more normal conditions could properly be described as far-fetched, has a certain worrying resonance.

I agree that the current White House Administration is capable of anything in their pursuit of an America Empire. Whether launching a nuclear attack upon their own people is an option is questionable. After all, the America people, whether Liberals or Conservatives, appear to be incapable of resisting their war-mongering, hegemonic Government anyway!

We live in an increasing nightmare!
10/23/07 @ 00:10



Comment from: pandora [Member]
Joe Wheeler, it's all on the their site and it wasn't hard to find.

Go to the web address below for the story of the fallen military people.
There are news links to all their deaths.

http://www.legitgov.org/minot_afb_nukes_oddities.html

The following section was compiled by 'The Pundit.'
Since the Minot story broke a week ago about the missing nukeclandestine operation from Minot, we have the following (for those who are paying attention):

1. All six people listed below are from Minot Airforce base
2. All were directly involved as loaders or as pilots
3. All are now dead
4. All within the last 7 days in 'accidents' [Not all of them --LRP]

News sites about the deaths:

http://www.kfyrtv.com/News_Stories.asp?news=10465

http://www.shreveporttimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070915/BREAKINGNEWS/70915012

http://www.kxmc.com/News/161562.asp

http://www.kxmc.com/getArticle.asp?ArticleId=140988

http://www.bismarcktribune.com/articles/2007/07/20/news/state/136489.txt

http://www.komotv.com/news/local/9679367.html

Oooh, baby, baby it's a white world

by lwtc247 @ 06. Sep 2007 - 18:20:35

white world

Now that I've lost everything to you
You say you wanna start something new
And it's breakin' my heart, you're stealin'
Baby, I'm grievin'

We prey for the day you leave, the pains to strong
Culture destroyed, we've forgotten our old folk song
And you'll never admit your crimes were wrong

Oh, baby, baby, it's a white world
We have to get by just upon a smile
Oh, baby, baby, it's a white world
I'll always remember I'm your child, girl

You know I've seen a lot of what your world can do
And it breaks my heart in two
'Cause you never wanna see me free girl
Don't be a bad girl

All we want is that you leave, take good care
But we guess you repeat your crimes out there
We'll always remember your sin and beware

Beware
Oh, baby, baby, it's a white world
We have to get by just upon a smile
Oh, baby, baby, it's a white world
I'll always remember I'm your child, girl

Baby, shame on you
All we want is that you leave, world take care
And we guess you repeat your crimes out there
We'll always remember your sin and beware

Beware
Oh, baby, baby, it's a white world
We have to get by just upon a smile
Oh, baby, baby, it's a white world
I'll always remember I'm your child, girl

Oh, baby, baby, it's a white world
...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVSqTHWc6jw

David Shayler on the phone.

by lwtc247 @ 06. Sep 2007 - 11:10:17

I have just had a chat with David Shayler.

I sent David a text a few weeks ago asking him for an interview in the context of 9-11 and 7-7 truthers being unhappy about David’s recent self declaration of being the Messiah. Today, I received a TEXT basically saying 'call me'. I didn't have a clue who it was from, so I called the number, just in case there was some emergency or what have you.

I'm afraid that the whole thing to me totally by surprise and even though it wasn't a long conversation I can't remember hardly any of what we talked about, but I'll give it a stab...

"Hello it's me, David" I couldn't place the voice with the name. I didn't have a clue who it was. I also hadn't tuned into David’s voice properly yet either so I didn't manage to pick up of David’s vocal uniqueness. "It's David Shayler, you sent me a text asking to go for some interview" - Boom! Then it hit me. I was shocked not because I was "star struck" but because I totally thought my initial contact with him had lead to nothing and was long dead and buried, coupled to the fact that I never expected David to contact me directly rather, read my request and then act upon it, without my involvement, so a big surprise that David took time out to speak to me.

Anyway, after trying to pull my thoughts together gaining a little bit of focus, I said "I'd wanted you to do an interview because of the ‘waves’ you had made with the 9-11 and 7-7 truth movements from your recent expression of your spiritual beliefs. I was being gentle, I didn't want to appear hostile, but he said "I actually went a lot further than that, I said I was the Messiah!" Again I was speechless. David showed a level of frankness I had seldom seen. David gave me a quick rundown on how the 9-11 and 7-7 truthers were showing little difference between those they oppose in that they were denying spiritually. I said he had a point and I accepted what he was saying. I mean If I was an atheist in the 9-11 ‘truth movement’ and I declared that I had come to accept the Islam then I doubt many would bat an eyelid. If I said Buddhist – same thing. Why should one set of beliefs be acceptable but others not. Yes Davids’s claim is perhaps one of the most extraordinary claims one could make but, the issue is, it’s his right to adopt any beliefs he see fit. I believe there legitimacy in a separation of issues here. Davids spiritual beliefs do not make the crimes of mass murderers Blair and Bush non-crimes. No.

Before, when David 'outed' himself, I was asking respected 'truthers' to be cautious and not so quick to judge. I did so because I believed he could be sincere. Many 9-11 and 7-7 truthers seemed to think he was some kind of variant of a straw man. I found that difficult to accept because I had seen and heard a lot of what David has done in the 'movement' and I conclude that the good work he has done in exposing the crimes and vileness of United States of Zion and the United Kingdom of Zionists, i.e. the NWO. He has done far much more to expose the lies and the evil than he could ever hope to strengthen it by doing a straw man.

David has obviously given the 'Introduction to my beliefs 101' speech to others in the past and did so to some degree to me. If only I was more focused I could have gone onto new ground more quickly than I did.

I said to him that he and David Icke seemed to share a lot of similarities, and David Shayler (DS for short) said 'only {agree} on some things' for example DS doesn't accept the reptilian aspect of what Icke says (let me call it Icke-ism) or the Ickean 'oneness' DS seemed strongly opposed to this.

I ran out of credit and we got cut off. I was worried in case David thought I had hung up on him. Blast! Not able to recharge! Aaaagh!

Thankfully, he was good enough to call me back. I asked him about 2012. He said its a date that many ancient cultures referenced. He also said many psychics couldn't read past this date. The Universe with change around us he said. Reality wont be like what it is now.

(Man I wish I could reproduce his exact words! Damn!)

He also said on reading the book of revelation he realised it was written in code, he (only?) could see it it was meant for him. I asked him about this that the bible had been changed by man for years. How could he be sure the code survived in that case. He said something like the alterations of man couldn't disrupt the code. Fair enough I thought then I prompted "its divinely protected?" and he agreed.

I said to him (poorly) have you considered the implications the arrival of the Messiah? I mean in the eschatological/theological sense? and I told him that I was looking at things from the Islamic perspective as that is the path I chose to embark upon. I cant remember properly what he said to this. Damn! but I prompted 'so all the official organized religions were wrong and manipulated. He agreed. He then mentioned something about Sufi Islam in that Sufi's reacted very strangely around him. David (i think) said that the Sufis had knowledge of the ways or manifestations of God.

I told David I'd like to follow all this up because there can be nothing more important than the end of the Earth and day of judgement and since last year, I have come across a number of serious researchers who point to the day of reckoning is just around the corner who are able to provide a fantastic synthesis of politics with theology. I know people have been predicting doomsday for years, but this one is very convincing (and yes, I know that over the years people who have thought the end is nigh have ALWAYS thought 'this is the one'). He asked me to go to a press conference he was giving, tomorrow(now today 6-Sept-07), but geographically I told his its wasn’t possible at the moment, but I'll ask him to document his claims.

My conclusions are that he is very sincere. David cannot be a straw man. His exposure of the Zionist NWO is far greater than any protection some think he has given it. Additionally he knows the ridicule he's going to get. He is very confident in his assertions. He's not mad. The degree of research he has done on all this, is I would say, is quite extensive and well connected and shows itself well in what David says.

One more interesting thing he said: Was that, as the Messiah he had the ear of God. I asked him about this. Did he have any communication with God. He said "yes, in much the same way as I have a conversation with a person". I was conscious of the fact that phone credit was going to be a problem and so had to rush and would only be able to scratch the surface of this so didn't get the opportunity to ask more about it. Damn again!!

Maybe your wondering Does lwtc247 believe him? Well... I hold the Quran as the unadulterated truth - the only absolutism we can ever have. I will never shake from that position. And as a believer in Islam, I have to believe a number of dogmas, Armageddon is one of them. So I feel I have an obligation to at least be inquisitorial about what may be a sign of those times. If what David says EVER contradicts Islam then I will know that David in incorrect in what he says and if so then I feel its just through misinterpretation rather than malice.

I don't have time to go into this VERY DEEP branch part of philosophy right now, but it was my understanding that the Quran describes the Messiah (Isa - the arabic word/name for Jesus) will appear outside a place of worship in Damascus. Inside the Mosque is the Imam Mehdi who as come to expose the anti-Christ (Dajaal / the beast) who has based himself in Jerusalem where he has been ruling the world. The anti-Christ has surrounded the Imam, whereupon, God sends down the Messiah/Jesus/Isa/the REAL Christ, who is 'escorted' by two angles. Now, from this admittedly 2nd hand description of events (shame on me for not looking it up 1st hand yet) it looks to me like David is NOT the messiah because he hasn't made his appearance in Damascus, and it seems like that appearance at Damascus is the first re-appearance of the Messiah. But having said that, the more I think about it, the more I wonder if Damascus is actually the first known appearance. Result: More reading required!

One other thing David said was that the NWO has already failed, because He (the Messiah) has already appeared. They have not been able to stop him.

Someone who blew the whistle on MI6's disgusting plan to fund terrorists to kill Gadafee, a plot that went wrong and killed a girl(?) and has done so much to expose the filth of the USUK government cannot be, by any reasonable sceptical person, still an agent. Quite simply because IMO, he has don’t nothing to help it.

I will ask David in later discussions questions which offer the possibility of contradicting the Quran. If he does contradict it directly, (I say directly because he has already contradicted it indirectly but only through interpretation) then I will know for 100% sure that he's incorrect. If this is the case then I'd like to find out WHY EXACTLY does he think this way? Is it all psychology / chemicals, or and it must be said, he is normal and may actually be the Messiah.

I'll keep you posted.

And Thank you David for sparing me some of your time. I’ll send some more worthy questions later if you don’t mind. It’s important – from every angle - that it gets documented.

As I close this post, Assuming David is not the Messiah, I wonder what reaction the people will give to the real Messiah when he comes. You can bet it's going to be with massive disblief. People will let the physical and career history of the guy be their discriminant. Speeks volumes of and from a population that elected killer T BLiar and GW BuSh and so forth.

DS's website for those intrested amongst you: http://daveshayler.com/

lwtc247

US Marines systematically execute Iraqis

by lwtc247 @ 03. Sep 2007 - 17:01:08

This page is reproduced from:
http://infowars.net/articles/august2007/310807Slaughter.htm
For damn obvious reasons.

Marines Ordered To Execute Civilians In Nazi-Like Slaughter
Latest evidence compounds catalogue of war crimes

By Steve Watson
Infowars.net Editorial
Thursday, August 30, 2007

With evidence having emerged that marines were ordered by superiors to massacre women and children in Haditha in Iraq two years ago, combined with scores of other testimonies and reports of such barbaric demands being forced upon American troops daily, it is clear that organised execution and ritual slaughter is the set policy of the architects of aggression in the middle east.

A military court heard Thursday that a US Marine was ordered to execute a room full of Iraqi women and children during the massacre in Haditha which left 24 people dead.

Following a response to roadside bomb attack in November, 2005 Marines stormed houses in the village. At the first of the houses, Marine Lance Corporal, Humberto Mendoza, has given evidence that he was ordered to execute some of the occupants under the command of Sergeant Frank Wuterich. Mendoza stated he refused to do so, when confronted with a room full of women and children. Later he found the women and children dead. Mendoza had previously admitted shooting one male occupant of the house dead, under orders.

AFP reports:

At one house Wuterich gave an order to shoot on sight as Marines waited for a response after knocking on the door, said Mendoza.

"He said 'Just wait till they open the door, then shoot,'" Mendoza said.

Mendoza then said he shot and killed an adult male who appeared in a doorway.

During a subsequent search of the house, Mendoza said he received an order from another Marine, Lance Corporal Stephen Tatum, to shoot seven women and children he had found in a rear bedroom.

"When I opened the door there was just women and kids, two adults were lying down on the bed and there were three children on the bed ... two more were behind the bed," Mendoza said.

"I looked at them for a few seconds. Just enough to know they were not presenting a threat ... they looked scared. I told him there were women and kids inside there. He said 'Well, shoot them,'" Mendoza told prosecutor Lieutenant Colonel Sean Sullivan.

"And what did you say to him?" Sullivan asked.

"I said 'But they're just women and children.' He didn't say nothing."

Mendoza said he returned to a position at the front of the house and heard a door open behind him followed by a loud noise. Returning later that afternoon to conduct body retrieval, Mendoza said he found a room full of corpses.

In previous testimony it has also been suggested that the troops stopped random passing cars, ordered passengers out and lined them up and shot them one by one at near-point blank range with M16 machine guns.

Wuterich's defense is expected to argue that he followed established combat zone rules of engagement. Given that Haditha is not an isolated incident this seems an accurate description.

A 2006 article adapted from the book “Ten Excellent Reasons Not to Join the Military,” edited by Elizabeth Weill-Greenberg, documents many other testimonies of troops on the ground who have confirmed that they are routinely ordered to kill innocent civilians.

There is constant pressure to kill Iraqi civilians, 22-year-old GI Darrell Anderson said. “At traffic stops we kill innocent people all the time. If you are fired on from the street, you are supposed to fire on everybody that is there. If I am in a market, I shoot people who are buying groceries.”

 War crimes in Iraq are not mere aberrations. They emanate from official policies regarding the aims and conduct of the occupation, the article concludes:

It is official policy, for example, to use cluster bombs in populated areas. Soldiers and Marines merely carry out the policy. It was official policy, under Operation Iron Hammer, to put barbed wire around villages, to bulldoze crops, to bomb homes, and to hold families in jail until they released insurgent information. It was official policy to level Fallujah, a city of 300,000 people, as an act of collective punishment.

The list goes on. It was official policy to torture detainees at Abu Ghraib, it was official policy to "kill all military age males" in Iraq, it is official policy to use radioactive Depleted Uranium weapons and deadly white phosphorus in civilian areas in Iraq. The wanton destruction from the air of cities, towns, and villages witnessed on the first night of the war and almost everyday since is official policy in Iraq.

When will the official policies be recognized for what they are, official war crimes?

The systematic killing of civilians in Iraq and throughout the middle east by aggressive forces under the control of the elite usurpers of our governments is clear. Our controlled media is also complicit in its ignorance, its pandering spin and the outright lies we continue to have to endure and break down with every passing day.

Prominent critics and commentators have blasted the mainstream media for failing to portray the brutal reality of the systematic policy of slaughter.

Acclaimed director Brian De Palma, whose new film "Redacted" has stunned audiences with its graphic telling of the horrific true story of another Iraq war crime, has stated:

 

"In Vietnam, when we saw the images and the sorrow of the people we were traumatizing and killing, we saw the soldiers wounded and brought back in body bags. We see none of that in this war. It's all out there on the Internet, you can find it if you look for it, but it's not in the major media. The media is now really part of the corporate establishment."

 

De Palma has asserted that it is only the brutal reality seen in the pictures and videos that are routinely ignored by the establishment media that will incense the public enough to force the conflict to be stopped.

Paul Craig Roberts, former Secretary to the Treasury under Reagan, has also blasted the mainstream media in a powerful piece today stating:

"The US media focuses on whether Republican Senator Larry Craig is a homosexual or has offended gays by denying being one of them. The run-up for the public's attention is why a South Carolina beauty queen cannot answer a simple question about why her generation is unable to find the United States on a map."

Roberts describes Bush as "high on the list of mass murderers of all time". With conservatively over one million Iraqis having lost their lives in this war "The vast majority of "kills" by the US military in Iraq and Afghanistan are civilians, the war criminal is in the living room, and no official notice is taken of the fact" he writes.

He warns that the same will happen in Iran very soon if this administration and the power brokers behind it are not halted right away:

"Encouraged by the indifference of both the American media and Christian churches to the massive casualties inflicted on Iraqi civilians, the Bush administration will not be deterred by the prospect of its air attacks inflicting massive casualties on Iranian civilians. Last summer the Bush administration demonstrated to the entire world its total disdain for Muslim life when Bush supported Israel's month-long air attack on Lebanese civilian infrastructure and civilian residences. President Bush blocked the attempt by the rest of the world to halt the gratuitous murder of Lebanese civilians and infrastructure destruction. Clearly, turning the Muslim Middle East into a wasteland is the Bush policy. For Bush, civilian casualties are a non-issue. Hegemony uber alles."

 

Every instance described here provides evidence of direct violation of the Geneva Conventions, which state (Part IV, Article 48):combatants “shall at all times distinguish between the civilian population and combatants, between civilian objects and military objectives and, accordingly, shall direct their operations only against military objectives.”

The conventions were established in the aftermath of the Nazi's indiscriminate slaughter of millions of civilians throughout Europe. It is clear that our own modern day aggressors do not believe they are bound by the conventions, nor any international laws of war that have come before, and will do whatever it takes to ensure their empire building proceeds unimpeded.

Unless we address the reality of the war crimes we have seen unfold in the last 6 years alone, and continue in our attempts to do the job that the corporate media whores are paid not to, we betray our ethical and moral principles, we betray our countries, and we betray the freedom that has been protected for so long by those before us.